Announcement PDF Registered Offices – Trek Metals Limited – ARBN 124 462 826 Australia Suite 5/2 Centro Avenue Subiaco Western Australia 6008 Bermuda Vallis Building, 4th Floor 58 Par-la-Ville Road Hamilton HM 11 Postal PO Box 1696 Subiaco WA 6904 Phone 08 6383 7844 Email info@trekmetals.com.au 8 September 2026 Outstanding High-Grade Assays Confirm Significant Shallow Manganese Discovery at Kuro Second assay batch delivers multiple shallow, high-grade intercepts, including 7m @ 40.2% Mn, with Phase 2 drilling now underway targeting priority IP anomalies Highlights • Second batch of laboratory drill assays from Trek’s maiden RC drilling program confirm a high- grade, near-surface manganese discovery at Kuro, within the 100%-owned Christmas Creek Project in WA’s Kimberley region. • Of the 50 Phase 1 holes assayed to date, 28 have returned significant manganese intercepts above 5% Mn, including 16 holes with intercepts above 20% Mn. • Standout intercept of 7m @ 40.2% Mn from 7m in 26XCRC026, within o 14m @ 23.6% Mn from 6m • Multiple additional high-grade results include: o 8m @ 32.7% Mn from 3m in 26XCRC033, within  10m @ 27.8% Mn from 2m o 6m @ 39.0% Mn from 28m in 26XCRC028, within  8m @ 31.3% Mn from 28m o 4m @ 38.6% Mn from 2m in 26XCRC041, within  8m @ 24.1% Mn from 2m o 4m @ 36.8% Mn from 14m in 26XCRC023, within  6m @ 30.5% Mn from 13m o 4m @ 32.8% Mn from 13m in 26XCRC024, within  7m @ 24.5% Mn from 12m o 3m @ 42.7% Mn from 26m in 26XCRC037, within  8m @ 20.6% Mn from 23m o 3m @ 41.8% Mn from 13m in 26XCRC025, within  13m @ 15.3% Mn from 6m • Manganese mineralisation is characterised by low iron and very low phosphorus, with intercepts averaging ≥20% Mn returning 27.0% Mn at 3.28% Fe for an Mn:Fe ratio of 8.3:1, improving to 14.4:1 in composites above 30% Mn and 47:1 in the highest-grade intercept (10m @ 42.3% Mn at 0.90% Fe in 26XCRC020). • Remaining assay results from the rest of the Phase 1 drilling expected in 2-3 weeks. • The 2,500m Phase 2 drilling program at Kuro has now commenced targeting key IP anomalies. 2 Trek Metals Limited (ASX: TKM) (“Trek” or the “Company”) is pleased to advise that the second batch of assay results from its maiden Reverse Circulation (RC) drill program at the Kuro prospect has returned multiple high-grade intercepts, confirming a significant shallow, high-grade manganese discovery within its 100%-owned Christmas Creek Project in Western Australia. Table 1. Significant intercept table of laboratory assays for 26XCRC022 – 26XCRC050, using a 5% Mn lower cut-off for broad intercepts and a 20% Mn lower cut-off for high-grade sub-intervals (including) with a minimum width of 2m and a maximum internal dilution of 2m. Widths reported are down-hole as true widths are not known. Manganese (Mn) Metres are Width (m) x Mn%. Individual assay values and composite grades have been rounded for presentation. Hole ID From (m) To (m) Width (m) Mn (%) Mn Metres (m x %) Significant Intercept 26XCRC023 13 19 6 30.5 182.8 6m @ 30.5% Mn from 13m including 14 18 4 36.8 147.2 incl. 4m @ 36.8% Mn from 14m 26XCRC024 12 19 7 24.5 171.5 7m @ 24.5% Mn from 12m including 13 17 4 32.8 131 incl. 4m @ 32.8% Mn from 13m 26XCRC025 6 19 13 15.3 199.3 13m @ 15.3% Mn from 6m including 13 16 3 41.8 125.3 incl. 3m @ 41.8% Mn from 13m 26XCRC026 6 20 14 23.6 329.9 14m @ 23.6% Mn from 6m including 7 14 7 40.2 281.2 incl. 7m @ 40.2% Mn from 7m 26XCRC027 15 22 7 9.6 67.4 7m @ 9.6% Mn from 15m 26XCRC028 28 36 8 31.3 250.8 8m @ 31.3% Mn from 28m including 28 34 6 39 234.3 incl. 6m @ 39.0% Mn from 28m 26XCRC029 21 27 6 23.5 140.8 6m @ 23.5% Mn from 21m including 22 26 4 30.9 123.6 incl. 4m @ 30.9% Mn from 22m 26XCRC031 5 9 4 26.1 104.2 4m @ 26.1% Mn from 5m including 6 9 3 30.5 91.6 incl. 3m @ 30.5% Mn from 6m 26XCRC033 2 12 10 27.8 277.7 10m @ 27.8% Mn from 2m including 3 11 8 32.7 261.5 incl. 8m @ 32.7% Mn from 3m 26XCRC035 13 17 4 14.3 57.4 4m @ 14.3% Mn from 13m including 13 15 2 23.4 46.8 incl. 2m @ 23.4% Mn from 13m 26XCRC037 23 31 8 20.6 164.6 8m @ 20.6% Mn from 23m including 26 29 3 42.7 128.2 incl. 3m @ 42.7% Mn from 26m 26XCRC038 23 25 2 24.9 49.7 2m @ 24.9% Mn from 23m 26XCRC039 14 19 5 10.1 50.3 5m @ 10.1% Mn from 14m 26XCRC039 22 25 3 9.2 27.6 3m @ 9.2% Mn from 22m 26XCRC040 22 26 4 7 28 4m @ 7.0% Mn from 22m 26XCRC041 2 10 8 24.1 192.6 8m @ 24.1% Mn from 2m including 2 6 4 38.6 154.5 incl. 4m @ 38.6% Mn from 2m 26XCRC042 3 10 7 13.7 96.2 7m @ 13.7% Mn from 3m 3 including 4 6 2 22.8 45.7 incl. 2m @ 22.8% Mn from 4m 26XCRC045 7 14 7 6.8 47.4 7m @ 6.8% Mn from 7m No significant intercepts (≥5% Mn over ≥2m) in 26XCRC022, 030, 032, 034, 036, 043, 044, 046, 047, 048, 049 & 050. Laboratory assays for the second batch of RC holes continue to define the presence of an extensive high-grade, near-surface manganese system at Kuro. Of the 50 Phase 1 holes assayed to date, 28 have returned significant manganese intervals above 5% Mn, including 16 with intercepts averaging above 20% Mn. The latest results include a standout intercept from drill-hole 26XCRC026 of 14m @ 23.6% Mn from 6m, including 7m at 40.2% Mn from 7m with a peak one-metre assay of 49.9% Mn. Holes 26XCRC037 and 025 returned very high-grade intervals of 3m @ 42.7% Mn from 26m and 3m @ 41.8% Mn from 13m respectively. Significant intercepts are reported in Table 1 and Figures 1-4 below. The mineralisation intersected to date remains shallow, with all significant intercepts (Table 1 & Figures 1-4) occurring between surface and 37m down-hole. The interpreted mineralised geometry trends from surface in the north-west and deepens progressively towards the south-east. Figure 1. Plan view of Kuro, Gradient Array Induced Polarisation (GAIP) Chargeability anomalism shown as full-colour background with contour lines (white-red hot indicative of highly chargeable zones), manganese outcrop as grey polygons with black outlines, completed Reverse Circulation drill-holes with hole ID and total visual massive and semi-massive manganese intercepts labelled and significant laboratory assay results in callouts and coloured dots. 4 Readers are reminded that Visual estimates of mineral abundance should never be considered a proxy or substitute for laboratory analyses where concentrations or grades are the factor of principal economic interest. Visual estimates also potentially provide no information regarding impurities or deleterious physical properties relevant to valuations. The visually observed manganese mineralisation is not representative of the entire Kuro Prospect, with drilling currently on- going to further assess the distribution of manganese. Representative drill samples are being routinely collected from the drill rig and will be analysed at ALS laboratories and reported in due course (laboratory assay results are expected progressively, with the first batch reported 6 Aug 2026, the second batch here and the final Phase 1 batch in 2-3 weeks). Trek Metals CEO, Derek Marshall, said: “These outstanding results confirm that Kuro is a significant shallow, high-grade manganese discovery, confirming that the high grades we saw in the first batch of results are being repeated across the system. “Importantly, 28 of the 50 assayed Phase 1 holes returned significant manganese intercepts, including 16 with intervals averaging above 20% Mn. We are also seeing some exceptional individual results, such as 7m grading more than 40% Mn, confirming that the system has the potential to deliver exceptional grades. “What is particularly encouraging is that we are still in at a very early stage in understanding the scale of this opportunity. Phase 2 of the Kuro exploration drill program is now underway to see if we can find additional pods of mineralisation beneath the sand. Phase 2 holes are targeting newly generated geophysical anomalies over a much larger area than the original Phase 1 drilling. “Our interpretation suggests that the host geology of the Kuro manganese mineralisation extends across a basin spanning a 30km strike length within Trek tenure which is highly prospective for additional manganese discoveries. “To help us more accurately define the basin architecture, we have just completed a high-resolution fixed-wing magnetic survey over this area. In addition to magnetics, the aeroplane also collects radiometric data, which was critical in the initial discovery of Kuro. We eagerly await the data from this survey to inform our ongoing exploration efforts. “A detailed Sub-Audio Magnetic (SAM) survey has also recently been completed over the Martin high- grade gold prospect, with the data to be integrated with existing datasets and used to aid in drill targeting. We look forward to updating the market with a steady flow of exploration results and activity as the season progresses.” 5 Figure 2. Long Section Line 1, along the main (southern) chargeability anomaly along strike from the main manganese outcrop, showing interpreted geology, highlighting the ~400m strike of visual manganese mineralisation in black. New and previously released laboratory significant intercepts as individual callouts (refer Table 1) and previously released significant visual intercepts. Cross-section Line 1 location also shown. Long section line location shown in Figure 1. Readers are reminded that Visual estimates of mineral abundance should never be considered a proxy or substitute for laboratory analyses where concentrations or grades are the factor of principal economic interest. Visual estimates also potentially provide no information regarding impurities or deleterious physical properties relevant to valuations. The visually observed manganese mineralisation is not representative of the entire Kuro Prospect, with drilling currently on-going to further assess the distribution of manganese. Representative drill samples are being routinely collected from the drill rig and will be analysed at ALS laboratories and reported in due course (laboratory assay results are expected progressively, with the first batch reported 6 Aug 2026, the second batch here and the final Phase 1 batch in 2-3 weeks). 6 Figure 3. Long Section Line 2, along the northern chargeability anomaly, showing interpreted geology, highlighting the ~300m and 150m strike of visual manganese mineralisation in black. New and previously released laboratory significant intercepts as individual callouts (refer Table 1) and previously released significant visual intercepts. Cross-section Line 1 location also shown. Long section line location shown in Figure 1. Readers are reminded that Visual estimates of mineral abundance should never be considered a proxy or substitute for laboratory analyses where concentrations or grades are the factor of principal economic interest. Visual estimates also potentially provide no information regarding impurities or deleterious physical properties relevant to valuations. The visually observed manganese mineralisation is not representative of the entire Kuro Prospect, with drilling currently on- going to further assess the distribution of manganese. Representative drill samples are being routinely collected from the drill rig and will be analysed at ALS laboratories and reported in due course (laboratory assay results are expected progressively, with the first batch reported 6 Aug 2026, the second batch here and the final Phase 1 batch in 2-3 weeks). Iron and phosphorus are typically the principal penalty elements in manganese ore. Intercepts averaging 20% Mn or better return 3.28% Fe and 0.026% P over 117m for an Mn:Fe ratio of approximately 8:1, with manganese and iron geochemically decoupled and the ratio improving with grade (to 14:1 in composites above 30% Mn and 47:1 in the 10m @ 42.3% Mn interval in 26XCRC020, which returned 0.90% Fe). Phosphorus is low across most intercepts, ranging from 0.014% to 0.115%, and is elevated only in 26XCRC006 and 26XCRC007. Silica is the principal diluent and falls as manganese grade rises, from 49.7% SiO₂ across the reported intercepts to 24.4% in the highest-grade interval. Lead is variably distributed, ranging from 36ppm to 0.60% across the reported intercepts, and shows no systematic relationship to manganese grade. Length-weighted averages for each intercept of 2m or greater are set out in Table 4. No metallurgical or product characterisation testwork has been undertaken at this stage and these observations are only indicative / early stage in nature. 7 Figure 4. Cross-Section Line linking the two Long Sections (Figure 2 & Figure 3) showing interpreted geology, highlighting the apparent ~50m widths of visual manganese mineralisation in black of the two pods. New and previously released laboratory significant intercepts as individual callouts (refer Table 1) and previously released significant visual intercepts (≥10m of massive to semi-massive manganese) as individual callouts. Long-section Line 1 and Line 2 locations also shown. Cross section line location shown in Figure 1. Readers are reminded that Visual estimates of mineral abundance should never be considered a proxy or substitute for laboratory analyses where concentrations or grades are the factor of principal economic interest. Visual estimates also potentially provide no information regarding impurities or deleterious physical properties relevant to valuations. The visually observed manganese mineralisation is not representative of the entire Kuro Prospect, with drilling currently on- going to further assess the distribution of manganese. Representative drill samples are being routinely collected from the drill rig and will be analysed at ALS laboratories and reported in due course (laboratory assay results are expected progressively, with the first batch reported 6 Aug 2026, the second batch here and the final Phase 1 batch in 2-3 weeks). 8 Ongoing Phase 2 RC drilling at Kuro is targeting the high-priority chargeability and conductivity anomalies defined by recent Induced Polarisation (IP) surveying across the greater Kuro region (Figure 5) and refer to Trek’s previous ASX announcement 19 August 2026, https://trekmetals.com.au/announcements/7689981). The current ~2,500m RC drill program is testing these anomalies across an area substantially larger than the Phase 1 drill area, with the objective of assessing the scale potential of the mineralised system within the heritage cleared area. Drill pads and access were prepared under the supervision of the Yi- Martuwarra (YMN) Traditional Owners. Figure 5. Induced Polarisation (IP) chargeability data (shown as 1VD to highlight short-wavelength, near-surface variation) with interpreted anomalous areas outlined in black and the previously announced Phase 1 IP survey area within a dashed box. The figure also shows collar points from the Phase 1 Kuro drilling, with either visual manganese metres (for holes with pending assay data) or laboratory manganese metres for those with assays. Readers are reminded that Visual estimates of mineral abundance should never be considered a proxy or substitute for laboratory analyses where concentrations or grades are the factor of principal economic interest. Visual estimates also potentially provide no information regarding impurities or deleterious physical properties relevant to valuations. The visually observed manganese mineralisation is not representative of the entire Kuro Prospect, with drilling currently on- going to further assess the distribution of manganese. Representative drill samples are being routinely collected from the drill rig and will be analysed at ALS laboratories and reported in due course (laboratory assay results are expected progressively, with the first batch reported 6 Aug 2026, the second batch here and the final Phase 1 batch in 2-3 weeks). 9 Gradient Array Induced Polarisation surveying has been completed at the Leviathan Prospect (Figure 6) and the Moombarriga survey crew have demobilised from site. A field crew are currently undertaking a reconnaissance soil sampling survey across the interpreted prospective basin (Figure 6) to assess the suitability of the exploration methodology for identifying additional manganese target areas. These two new datasets will be integrated with existing data and the recently completed airborne magnetic and radiometric data to help determine areas for follow- up within the interpreted ~30km long prospective basin at Christmas Creek. Figure 6. Preliminary Merged Residual Gravity imagery showing an interpreted ~30km long prospective Neoproterozoic basin hosting the Kuro manganese discovery outlined in white, highlighting the interpreted basin boundary and target stratigraphy within, the existing Kuro IP and drill area in the east and the recently completed gradient array IP extension survey areas. 10 Authorised by the Board of Directors ENDS For further information contact: INVESTORS: MEDIA: Derek Marshall Nicholas Read dmarshall@trekmetals.com.au info@trekmetals.com.au 0419 929 046 JOIN TKM’S INTERACTIVE INVESTOR HUB https://trekmetals.com.au/auth/signup Interact with Trek Metal’s announcements and updates by asking questions and comments which our team can respond to where possible https://trekmetals.com.au/link/y0V47r COMPETENT PERSONS STATEMENT The information in this report relating to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Mr Derek Marshall, a Competent Person, and Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG). Mr Marshall has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and to the type of activity described to qualify as a competent person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves.” Mr Marshall has disclosed that he holds fully paid Ordinary Shares and Performance Rights in the Company. Mr Marshall consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and content in which it appears. Cautionary Statement: This announcement reports Exploration Results only. No Mineral Resource has been estimated for the Kuro Prospect and insufficient exploration has been completed to estimate a Mineral Resource. Further drilling and evaluation is required, and it is uncertain whether further exploration will result in the estimation of a Mineral Resource. DISCLAIMERS AND FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This announcement contains forward looking statements. Forward looking statements are often, but not always, identified by words such as "seek", “target”, "anticipate", “forecast”, "believe", "plan", "estimate", "expect" and "intend" and statements that an event or result "may", "will", "should", "could" or "might" occur or be achieved and other similar expressions. The forward-looking statements in this announcement are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about Trek and the industry in which it operates. They do, however, relate to future matters and are subject to various inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual events or results may differ materially from the events or results expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. The past performance of Trek is no guarantee of future performance. None of Trek’s directors, officers, employees, agents or contractors makes any representation or warranty (either express or implied) as to the accuracy or likelihood of fulfilment of any forward- looking statement, or any events or results expressed or implied in any forward-looking statement, except to the extent required by law. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward- looking statement. The forward-looking statements in this announcement reflect views held only as at the date of this announcement. 11 Table 2. Specific Exploration results referred to in this report were originally reported in the following Company announcements. Title Date Additional Drilling Planned at the Kuro Manganese Discovery Targeting High-Priority IP Anomalies https://trekmetals.com.au/announcements/7689981 19 August 2026 First Drill Assays Confirm High-Grade Manganese at Kuro https://trekmetals.com.au/announcements/7669969 6 August 2026 IP Drilling Validates Concealed Manganese Targeting at Kuro https://trekmetals.com.au/announcements/7646589 23 July 2026 Drilling Continues to Intersect Mineralisation at Kuro https://trekmetals.com.au/announcements/7618301 6 July 2026 Multiple Mineralised Zones Intersected at Kuro https://trekmetals.com.au/announcements/7604907 29 June 2026 Kuro IP Survey planned, RC Drill contract and assay results https://trekmetals.com.au/announcements/7467887 30 March 2026 Petrophysics Confirms Geophysical Response from Kuro Rock Chips, IP Survey Planned and RC Drill Contract Awarded https://trekmetals.com.au/announcements/7457333 23 March 2026 Outstanding New High-Grade Manganese Rock Chip Results at the Kuro Prospect - Christmas Creek Project, WA https://trekmetals.com.au/announcements/7326226 19 January 2026 High-Grade Manganese Discovery at Christmas Creek Strengthened by Extensive, Strong Gravity Anomalies https://trekmetals.com.au/announcements/7311646 15 December 2025 Trek to accelerate exploration at new High-Grade Manganese Discovery at Christmas Creek Project, WA https://trekmetals.com.au/announcements/7263873 17 November 2025 Exceptionally High-Grade Manganese Discovery at Christmas Creek Project, WA https://trekmetals.com.au/announcements/7259499 13 November 2025 Discovery focused drilling gains momentum on several fronts https://trekmetals.com.au/announcements/7075982 29 July 2025 The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original announcements and that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the exploration results continue to apply and have not materially changed. 12 Table 3. Collar Table relating to holes which samples comprised Batch 2 being reported from 2026 Reverse Circulation drilling at the Christmas Creek Project, listing holes 26XCRC022 – 26XCRC050, co-ordinates listed are grid MGA2020 Z52. Hole ID Type Depth North East RL Dip Azi Lease ID Prospect 26XCRC022 RC 78 7873820 267292 331 -90 0 E80/4975 Kuro 26XCRC023 RC 84 7873836 267275 331 -90 0 E80/4975 Kuro 26XCRC024 RC 72 7873850 267261 332 -90 0 E80/4975 Kuro 26XCRC025 RC 66 7873897 267221 332 -90 0 E80/4975 Kuro 26XCRC026 RC 72 7873914 267205 332 -90 0 E80/4975 Kuro 26XCRC027 RC 72 7873936 267192 333 -90 0 E80/4975 Kuro 26XCRC028 RC 78 7873986 267169 333 -90 0 E80/4975 Kuro 26XCRC029 RC 78 7874016 267155 333 -90 0 E80/4975 Kuro 26XCRC030 RC 72 7874032 267138 333 -90 0 E80/4975 Kuro 26XCRC031 RC 60 7874066 267101 333 -90 0 E80/4975 Kuro 26XCRC032 RC 60 7874079 267081 333 -90 0 E80/4975 Kuro 26XCRC033 RC 54 7874097 267054 333 -90 0 E80/4975 Kuro 26XCRC034 RC 36 7874147 266948 333 -90 0 E80/5427 Kuro 26XCRC035 RC 72 7873936 267163 333 -90 0 E80/4975 Kuro 26XCRC036 RC 90 7873980 267193 333 -90 0 E80/4975 Kuro 26XCRC037 RC 78 7873916 267375 334 -90 0 E80/4975 Kuro 26XCRC038 RC 78 7873939 267367 334 -90 0 E80/4975 Kuro 26XCRC039 RC 66 7873992 267340 335 -90 0 E80/4975 Kuro 26XCRC040 RC 42 7874012 267328 335 -90 0 E80/4975 Kuro 26XCRC041 RC 36 7874061 267255 334 -90 0 E80/4975 Kuro 26XCRC042 RC 30 7874080 267266 335 -90 0 E80/4975 Kuro 26XCRC043 RC 48 7874101 267282 335 -90 0 E80/4975 Kuro 26XCRC044 RC 60 7874129 267300 335 -90 0 E80/4975 Kuro 26XCRC045 RC 42 7874042 267237 334 -90 0 E80/4975 Kuro 26XCRC046 RC 54 7874022 267221 334 -90 0 E80/4975 Kuro 26XCRC047 RC 54 7873999 267207 334 -90 0 E80/4975 Kuro 26XCRC048 RC 138 7873737 267020 331 -90 0 E80/4975 Kuro 26XCRC049 RC 108 7873849 267106 332 -90 0 E80/4975 Kuro 26XCRC050 RC 90 7873898 267136 332 -90 0 E80/4975 Kuro 13 Table 4. Length-weighted average composition of all significant manganese intercepts returned to date at the Kuro Prospect (holes 26XCRC001–050): 30 broad intercepts and 21 high-grade sub-intervals from 28 holes. Intercepts for holes 26XCRC022– 050 are set out in Table 1; those for holes 26XCRC004–020 were previously reported in the Company's announcement dated 6 August 2026. Broad intercepts are calculated using a 5% Mn lower cut-off and "including" sub-intervals a 20% Mn lower cut-off, each with a maximum 2m internal dilution; broad intercepts of less than 2m downhole width are excluded. Sub- intervals are contained within the broad intercept immediately above and are not additional to it; the weighted average row relates to the broad intercepts only, with Mn:Fe calculated as the ratio of average Mn to average Fe. Fe and P are reported as the element, converted from Fe₂O₃ and P₂O₅; LOI is loss on ignition; all results are on an as-received basis. Sulphur is below 0.02% S throughout and is not tabulated. Iron and phosphorus are the principal penalty elements in manganese ore; lead, arsenic, silica, alumina and barium are reported as constituents relevant to any future assessment of the mineralisation. No metallurgical or product characterisation testwork has been undertaken and no inference as to product specification should be drawn from these results. Hole ID From (m) Width (m) Mn % Fe % Mn:Fe P % SiO₂ % Al₂O₃ % BaO % LOI % Pb ppm As ppm 26XCRC004 5 2 12.8 6.74 1.9 0.022 58.4 6.44 0.34 6.0 636 28 26XCRC006 0 15 13.2 6.27 2.1 0.105 57.5 6.05 0.61 6.1 801 15 including 2 3 29.6 8.25 3.6 0.177 28.0 5.36 1.08 10.0 2,343 38 26XCRC007 0 4 44.6 1.86 24 0.115 13.5 5.19 1.37 11.9 49 18 26XCRC011 0 2 23.1 3.14 7.4 0.050 47.2 5.74 1.66 7.1 432 14 26XCRC014 9 11 19.3 1.72 11 0.023 53.2 6.40 2.00 6.1 91 20 including 9 3 32.7 1.67 20 0.032 34.6 4.99 1.89 8.6 125 26 26XCRC015 24 13 19.9 2.97 6.7 0.026 53.9 5.43 0.53 5.5 381 29 including 26 7 28.8 1.87 15 0.016 42.8 4.74 0.48 7.0 604 39 26XCRC016 8 8 25.4 4.44 5.7 0.016 44.0 5.03 0.45 7.3 1,834 31 including 8 5 32.8 5.48 6.0 0.017 31.8 4.04 0.45 8.6 2,711 38 26XCRC017 9 3 17.9 6.57 2.7 0.023 48.3 5.31 0.30 7.8 5,960 27 26XCRC017 16 2 11.5 11.61 1.0 0.039 52.6 5.82 0.24 6.4 209 20 26XCRC018 6 11 24.0 1.89 13 0.016 50.5 4.69 0.75 6.7 755 20 including 7 2 31.8 1.11 29 0.015 39.2 4.19 1.00 8.1 1,120 18 including 12 4 32.3 2.00 16 0.017 38.5 3.91 0.64 8.1 729 28 26XCRC019 0 6 25.4 3.15 8.1 0.016 44.2 6.16 0.75 8.0 104 19 including 0 5 28.1 3.09 9.1 0.015 40.1 6.27 0.64 8.5 118 20 26XCRC020 13 13 34.9 1.80 19 0.028 33.7 3.57 1.91 8.0 140 26 including 13 10 42.3 0.90 47 0.031 24.4 2.81 2.29 9.3 136 25 26XCRC023 13 6 30.5 5.31 5.7 0.022 32.2 5.50 2.03 8.6 176 45 including 14 4 36.8 4.28 8.6 0.018 25.2 4.51 2.25 9.4 165 52 26XCRC024 12 7 24.5 4.89 5.0 0.029 39.4 6.87 2.14 8.0 98 37 including 13 4 32.8 3.20 10.2 0.028 29.9 6.33 2.34 9.4 92 48 26XCRC025 6 13 15.3 6.77 2.3 0.033 52.6 6.76 1.28 6.5 114 34 14 Hole ID From (m) Width (m) Mn % Fe % Mn:Fe P % SiO₂ % Al₂O₃ % BaO % LOI % Pb ppm As ppm including 13 3 41.8 2.56 16.3 0.054 21.5 2.89 3.28 9.5 195 39 26XCRC026 6 14 23.6 1.84 12.8 0.030 48.8 6.17 0.91 6.7 88 15 including 7 7 40.2 0.86 46.5 0.037 27.9 3.63 0.74 9.1 118 21 26XCRC027 15 7 9.6 2.81 3.4 0.038 67.7 6.48 1.30 3.9 46 14 26XCRC028 28 8 31.3 6.51 4.8 0.027 33.4 3.31 1.09 7.5 579 49 including 28 6 39.0 4.86 8.0 0.028 24.7 2.55 1.20 8.9 621 53 26XCRC029 21 6 23.5 4.72 5.0 0.023 46.1 4.48 1.32 6.5 254 24 including 22 4 30.9 2.12 14.6 0.020 39.0 3.88 1.67 7.4 320 23 26XCRC031 5 4 26.1 4.41 5.9 0.025 41.5 5.38 0.77 7.9 259 43 including 6 3 30.5 4.60 6.6 0.029 35.1 4.59 0.87 8.5 278 49 26XCRC033 2 10 27.8 3.23 8.6 0.017 40.6 5.63 0.78 8.1 1069 38 including 3 8 32.7 2.69 12.1 0.018 34.1 5.10 0.82 8.9 1193 44 26XCRC035 13 4 14.3 2.88 5.0 0.028 62.0 5.95 0.71 5.2 89 26 including 13 2 23.4 3.68 6.4 0.028 48.7 4.72 0.39 6.9 74 45 26XCRC037 23 8 20.6 3.84 5.4 0.025 49.4 5.84 0.40 6.2 128 34 including 26 3 42.7 2.45 17.4 0.026 22.3 2.87 0.40 9.5 190 62 26XCRC038 23 2 24.9 1.64 15.2 0.018 46.1 5.99 1.32 6.7 36 19 26XCRC039 14 5 10.1 1.96 5.1 0.017 68.6 7.18 0.44 4.5 51 12 26XCRC039 22 3 9.2 3.40 2.7 0.023 66.8 6.92 0.93 4.4 72 17 26XCRC040 22 4 7.0 3.31 2.1 0.033 70.7 7.13 0.93 4.0 77 10 26XCRC041 2 8 24.1 1.86 13.0 0.015 49.2 5.31 0.99 6.9 161 26 including 2 4 38.6 1.80 21.5 0.018 28.3 3.76 1.23 9.2 218 40 26XCRC042 3 7 13.7 3.57 3.9 0.014 61.0 6.49 0.84 5.7 296 22 including 4 2 22.8 1.24 18.3 0.015 49.6 6.26 1.46 7.2 114 19 26XCRC045 7 7 6.8 3.32 2.0 0.021 72.5 6.83 0.71 4.0 103 11 Weighted Average 213 21.2 3.72 5.7 0.032 49.7 5.70 1.03 6.6 437 25 15 JORC Table Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data: Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Sampling techniques • Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. • Drilling was undertaken using RC with a face sampling bit. RC cuttings were collected at 1m intervals via a cyclone and cone splitter, producing ~2.5kg (mean 2.43kg and median 2.40kg) samples, with bulk residues retained on site and composite sampled as 4m intervals. • Each hole was sampled over its full length using a two-tier scheme: contiguous 1m rig-split samples over the interval of interest identified