Additional Drilling Planned at the Kuro Manganese Discovery
Released
Released
Announcement PDF
Registered Offices – Trek Metals Limited – ARBN 124 462 826
Australia
Suite 5/2 Centro Avenue
Subiaco Western
Australia 6008
Bermuda
Vallis Building, 4th Floor
58 Par-la-Ville Road
Hamilton HM 11
Postal
PO Box 1696
Subiaco
WA 6904
Phone
08 6383 7844
Email
info@trekmetals.com.au
19 August 2026
Additional Drilling Planned at the Kuro Manganese
Discovery Targeting High-Priority IP Anomalies
~2,500m drilling program targeting immediate extensions to the Kuro manganese discovery area
Highlights
• Induced Polarisation (IP) survey completed over the greater Kuro region, extending geophysical
coverage beyond the initial discovery footprint.
• New prospective areas identified using integrated chargeability, conductivity and gravity
datasets and comparing anomalies against the Kuro main mineralised zone as a geophysical
analogue, with results defining multiple new high-priority targets.
• Earthworks completed under the supervision of Traditional Owners, with a ~2,500m Phase 2
drilling program targeting key geophysical anomalies at Kuro set to commence shortly.
• EIS co-funded SAM (Sub-Audio Magnetics) survey underway at the Martin gold prospect.
• Regional drilling completed, comprising 17 holes for 1,894 metres to test early-stage rare earth,
gold and copper-gold soil anomalies.
• Drilling in progress at the Coogan copper-gold prospect, testing the IP target identified beneath
historical sulphide-bearing drilling.
Trek Metals Limited (ASX: TKM) (“Trek” or the “Company”) is pleased to provide an update on ongoing
exploration at its 100%-owned Christmas Creek Project in the East Kimberly region of Western
Australia, including target generation and Phase 2 drilling at the Kuro manganese discovery, co-funded
geophysical surveys at the Martin gold prospect, regional drilling and exploration programs.
Trek Metals CEO, Derek Marshall, said:
“The recent acquisition and interpretation of geophysical data over the region surrounding the initial
Kuro manganese discovery has provided the Company with a substantial number of anomalous target
areas that warrant drill testing.
“Encouragingly, many of these new chargeability and conductivity anomalies occur in a similar
orientation to those that host the high-grade manganese defined to date at Kuro, with Phase 2 drilling
set to commence shortly to determine whether these anomalies are related to further manganese at
depth across the broader area.
“Our strong relationships with the local traditional owner group and pastoral operator have allowed
Trek to prepare new drill access and pads to test this new round of geophysical targets in a timely
manner. Phase 2 drilling at Kuro is planned to comprise approximately 2,500m and is largely focused
on defining the potential scale of the mineralised system.
2
“The Company is advancing regional exploration across multiple fronts at Christmas Creek, with the IP
crew having just completed surveying over a new area – the Leviathan Prospect – within the
interpreted ~30km long basin hosting the manganese mineralisation at Kuro, additional mapping and
soil sampling about to commence, a fixed-wing magnetic and radiometric survey scheduled to
commence in the coming weeks and high-resolution SAM surveying underway at Martin aimed at
identifying key mineralised structures for future drill targeting.
“We look forward to updating the market as we continue to progress this multi-pronged exploration
campaign across the project area. The under-explored nature of the greater Christmas Creek Project
provides plenty of scope to build on the positive results we’ve seen to date, particularly as we continue
to unlock the Kuro manganese discovery and assess the potential for further manganese mineralisation
within the now 30km long interpreted prospective basin.”
Following the drill-validation of IP as an effective targeting method for concealed manganese at Kuro
(reported 23 July 2026, visual mineralisation in 43 of 51 holes against IP chargeability anomalies), the
Company has completed the planned IP survey across the greater Kuro region, covering the majority
of the area cleared under the Company's heritage agreements with the Yi-Martuwarra Ngurrara (YMN)
Traditional Owners (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Induced Polarisation (IP) chargeability data (shown as 1VD to highlight short-wavelength, near-surface variation)
with interpreted anomalous areas outlined in black and the previously announced Phase 1 IP survey area within a dashed
box. The figure also shows collar points from the Phase 1 Kuro drilling, with either visual manganese metres (for holes with
pending assay data) or laboratory manganese metres for those with assays.
Readers are reminded that Visual estimates of mineral abundance should never be considered a proxy or substitute for
laboratory analyses where concentrations or grades are the factor of principal economic interest. Visual estimates also
potentially provide no information regarding impurities or deleterious physical properties relevant to valuations.
The visually observed manganese mineralisation is not representative of the entire Kuro Prospect, with drilling currently on-
going to further assess the distribution of manganese. Representative drill samples are being routinely collected from the drill
3
rig and will be analysed at ALS laboratories and reported in due course (laboratory assay results are expected progressively,
with the first batch already reported, the second batch in 1-2 weeks and the final Phase 1 batch in 2-3 weeks).
Following a review of the IP survey results, Trek has identified numerous high-priority chargeability
(Figure 1) and conductivity (Figure 2) anomalies that warrant drill testing. These anomalies target the
potential continuation of the mineralised system beyond the area defined and drill tested in Phase 1
(refer Table 1 for links to previous ASX announcements).
Using the geophysical signature of the Kuro main mineralised zone as an analogue (specifically the
correlation between chargeability, conductivity and gravity response and visual/assayed manganese
mineralisation reported in the maiden drilling program), the Company has identified numerous
additional prospective areas across the broader Kuro area (Figure 1 & Figure 2).
Figure 2. Conductivity data (also acquired during the IP surveying) with interpreted anomalous areas outlined in blue and the
previously announced Phase 1 IP survey area within a dashed box. The figure also shows collar points from the Phase 1 Kuro
drilling, with either visual manganese metres (for holes with pending assay data) or laboratory manganese metres for those
with assays.
Readers are reminded that Visual estimates of mineral abundance should never be considered a proxy or substitute for
laboratory analyses where concentrations or grades are the factor of principal economic interest. Visual estimates also
potentially provide no information regarding impurities or deleterious physical properties relevant to valuations.
The visually observed manganese mineralisation is not representative of the entire Kuro Prospect, with drilling currently on-
going to further assess the distribution of manganese. Representative drill samples are being routinely collected from the drill
rig and will be analysed at ALS laboratories and reported in due course (laboratory assay results are expected progressively,
with the first batch already reported, the second batch in 1-2 weeks and the final Phase 1 batch in 2-3 weeks).
4
Earthworks have been completed over the prospective areas identified for Phase 2 drilling at Kuro,
with drilling set to commence shortly. The program is planned to comprise approximately 2,500m of
Reverse Circulation drilling, with a focus on the scale potential within the heritage cleared area.
The regional search space for additional manganese mineralisation is now interpreted to be within a
~30km long prospective basin (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Preliminary Merged Residual Gravity imagery highlighting an interpreted ~30km long prospective basin, with a low-
density response, hosting the Kuro manganese discovery (outlined in grey), highlighting the interpreted basin boundary
(dashed white) and target stratigraphy within, the existing Kuro IP and drill area in the centre and the recently completed
gradient array IP extension survey area at Leviathan in the east.
The Moombarriga IP crew recently completed a Gradient Array Induced Polarisation (GAIP) grid at the
Leviathan Prospect targeting additional manganese mineralisation (Figure 3).
A regional fixed-wing magnetic and radiometric survey is scheduled to commence in the coming weeks
aimed at better defining the basin architecture and potentially identifying additional radiometric
anomalism, similar to that which initially identified Kuro.
5
Figure 4. Field crew from Gap Geophysics undertaking Sub-Audio Magnetics (SAM) surveying at the Martin Propsect.
The Company's sub-audio magnetics (SAM) survey at the Martin gold prospect, which is co-funded
under the WA Government's Exploration Incentive Scheme, is now underway (Figure 4). The survey
aims to identify key mineralised structures as future drill targets.
Figure 5. Drilling on-going at the Coogan Cu-Au Prospect, targeting recently identified IP chargeability anomalism.
Drilling at the Coogan Copper-Gold Prospect is currently in progress (Figure 5), targeting recently
identified IP chargeability anomalies (refer: https://trekmetals.com.au/announcements/7646589 for
additional information).
6
Authorised by the Board of Directors
ENDS
For further information contact:
INVESTORS: MEDIA:
Derek Marshall Nicholas Read
dmarshall@trekmetals.com.au info@trekmetals.com.au 0419 929 046
JOIN TKM’S INTERACTIVE INVESTOR HUB
https://trekmetals.com.au/auth/signup
Interact with Trek Metal’s announcements and updates by asking
questions and comments which our team can respond to where possible
https://trekmetals.com.au/link/eYOpYP
COMPETENT PERSONS STATEMENT
The information in this report relating to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by the
Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Mr Derek Marshall, a Competent Person, and Member of the
Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG). Mr Marshall has sufficient experience relevant to the style
of mineralisation and to the type of activity described to qualify as a competent person as defined in
the 2012 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources
and Ore Reserves.” Mr Marshall has disclosed that he holds fully paid Ordinary Shares and
Performance Rights in the Company. Mr Marshall consents to the inclusion in this announcement of
the matters based on his information in the form and content in which it appears.
Cautionary Statement: This announcement reports Exploration Results only. No Mineral Resource
has been estimated for the Kuro Prospect and insufficient exploration has been completed to
estimate a Mineral Resource. Further drilling and evaluation is required, and it is uncertain whether
further exploration will result in the estimation of a Mineral Resource.
DISCLAIMERS AND FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This announcement contains forward looking statements. Forward looking statements are often, but
not always, identified by words such as "seek", “target”, "anticipate", “forecast”, "believe", "plan",
"estimate", "expect" and "intend" and statements that an event or result "may", "will", "should",
"could" or "might" occur or be achieved and other similar expressions.
The forward-looking statements in this announcement are based on current expectations, estimates,
forecasts and projections about Trek and the industry in which it operates. They do, however, relate
to future matters and are subject to various inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual events or results
may differ materially from the events or results expressed or implied by any forward-looking
statements. The past performance of Trek is no guarantee of future performance.
None of Trek’s directors, officers, employees, agents or contractors makes any representation or
warranty (either express or implied) as to the accuracy or likelihood of fulfilment of any forward-
looking statement, or any events or results expressed or implied in any forward-looking statement,
except to the extent required by law. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-
looking statement. The forward-looking statements in this announcement reflect views held only as
at the date of this announcement.
7
Table 1. Specific Exploration results referred to in this report were originally reported in the following Company
announcements.
Title Date
First Drill Assays Confirm High-Grade Manganese at Kuro
https://trekmetals.com.au/announcements/7669969
6 August 2026
IP Drilling Validates Concealed Manganese Targeting at Kuro
https://trekmetals.com.au/announcements/7646589
23 July 2026
Drilling Continues to Intersect Mineralisation at Kuro
https://trekmetals.com.au/announcements/7618301
6 July 2026
Multiple Mineralised Zones Intersected at Kuro
https://trekmetals.com.au/announcements/7604907
29 June 2026
Kuro IP Survey planned, RC Drill contract and assay results
https://trekmetals.com.au/announcements/7467887
30 March 2026
Petrophysics Confirms Geophysical Response from Kuro Rock Chips, IP Survey
Planned and RC Drill Contract Awarded
https://trekmetals.com.au/announcements/7457333
23 March 2026
Outstanding New High-Grade Manganese Rock Chip Results at the Kuro Prospect -
Christmas Creek Project, WA
https://trekmetals.com.au/announcements/7326226
19 January 2026
High-Grade Manganese Discovery at Christmas Creek Strengthened by Extensive,
Strong Gravity Anomalies
https://trekmetals.com.au/announcements/7311646
15 December 2025
Trek to accelerate exploration at new High-Grade Manganese Discovery at
Christmas Creek Project, WA
https://trekmetals.com.au/announcements/7263873
17 November 2025
Exceptionally High-Grade Manganese Discovery at Christmas Creek Project, WA
https://trekmetals.com.au/announcements/7259499
13 November 2025
Discovery focused drilling gains momentum on several fronts
https://trekmetals.com.au/announcements/7075982
29 July 2025
The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information
included in the original announcements and that all material assumptions and technical parameters
underpinning the exploration results continue to apply and have not materially changed.
8
JORC Table Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data:
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling
techniques
• Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut
channels, random chips, or specific
specialised industry standard measurement
tools appropriate to the minerals under
investigation, such as down hole gamma
sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc).
These examples should not be taken as
limiting the broad meaning of sampling.
• Include reference to measures taken to
ensure sample representivity and the
appropriate calibration of any measurement
tools or systems used.
• Aspects of the determination of mineralisation
that are Material to the Public Report. In cases
where ‘industry standard’ work has been done
this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse
circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m
samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to
produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other
cases more explanation may be required,
such as where there is coarse gold that has
inherent sampling problems. Unusual
commodities or mineralisation types (eg
submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of
detailed information.
• A Gradient Array Induced Polarisation (GAIP) survey was designed
and processed by Resource Potentials and the survey data were
acquired by Moombarriga Geoscience. New, high resolution, GAIP
chargeability and resistivity data was collected over the Kuro prospect,
with a receiver 25m and line spacing of 50m. Surveyed areas varied
with survey lines crossing perpendicular to the Mn outcrop strike and
interpreted structural control in areas away from the Mn outcrop. A
total of 123.775 line-km of GAIP survey data have now been acquired
at the Kuro prospect.
• Moombarriga used the ex-Search 50 kVA IP transmitter for the survey,
resulting in transmitted currents between 5.3 and 10 A across a range
of voltages between 1000 – 3200 VDC. High current resulted in clean
and repeatable data. Signal transmitted at 0.125 Hz and 50% duty
cycle. Data were recorded using EMIT SmarTEM 24-bit receivers
coupled with wired receiver arrays and non-polarising, porous pot,
Pb/PbCl2 electrodes.
• Drilling and associated assays referred to in this announcement has
been previously announced, readers are referred to Table 1 within the
release for a table of links to previous company announcements.
Drilling
techniques
• Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-
hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka,
sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple
or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-
sampling bit or other type, whether core is
oriented and if so, by what method, etc).
• Drilling and associated assays referred to in this announcement has
been previously announced, readers are referred to Table 1 within the
release for a table of links to previous company announcements.
Drill sample
recovery
• Method of recording and assessing core and
chip sample recoveries and results assessed.
• Measures taken to maximise sample recovery
and ensure representative nature of the
samples.
• Whether a relationship exists between sample
recovery and grade and whether sample bias
may have occurred due to preferential
loss/gain of fine/coarse material.
• Drilling and associated assays referred to in this announcement has
been previously announced, readers are referred to Table 1 within the
release for a table of links to previous company announcements.
Logging • Whether core and chip samples have been
geologically and geotechnically logged to a
level of detail to support appropriate Mineral
Resource estimation, mining studies and
metallurgical studies.
• Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative
in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc)
photography.
• The total length and percentage of the
relevant intersections logged.
• Drilling and associated assays referred to in this announcement has
been previously announced, readers are referred to Table 1 within the
release for a table of links to previous company announcements.
Sub-sampling
techniques
and sample
preparation
• If core, whether cut or sawn and whether
quarter, half or all core taken.
• If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled,
rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or
dry.
• For all sample types, the nature, quality and
appropriateness of the sample preparation
technique.
• Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-
sampling stages to maximise representivity of
samples.
• Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is
representative of the in-situ material collected,
including for instance results for field
• Drilling and associated assays referred to in this announcement has
been previously announced, readers are referred to Table 1 within the
release for a table of links to previous company announcements.
9
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
duplicate/second-half sampling.
• Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the
grain size of the material being sampled.
Quality of
assay data
and
laboratory
tests
• The nature, quality and appropriateness of the
assaying and laboratory procedures used and
whether the technique is considered partial or
total.
• For geophysical tools, spectrometers,
handheld XRF instruments, etc, the
parameters used in determining the analysis
including instrument make and model, reading
times, calibrations factors applied and their
derivation, etc.
• Nature of quality control procedures
adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates,
external laboratory checks) and whether
acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias)
and precision have been established.
• Moombarriga used the ex-Search 50 kVA IP transmitter for the survey,
resulting in transmitted currents between 5.3 and 10 A across a range
of voltages between 1000 – 3200 VDC. High current resulted in clean
and repeatable data. Signal transmitted at 0.125 Hz and 50% duty
cycle. Data were recorded using EMIT SmarTEM 24-bit receivers
coupled with wired receiver arrays and non-polarising, porous pot,
Pb/PbCl2 electrodes.
Verification of
sampling and
assaying
• The verification of significant intersections by
either independent or alternative company
personnel.
• The use of twinned holes.
• Documentation of primary data, data entry
procedures, data verification, data storage
(physical and electronic) protocols.
• Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
• Drilling and associated assays referred to in this announcement has
been previously announced, readers are referred to Table 1 within the
release for a table of links to previous company announcements.
Location of
data points
• Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate
drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys),
trenches, mine workings and other locations
used in Mineral Resource estimation.
• Specification of the grid system used.
• Quality and adequacy of topographic control.
• Location of drill collars were recorded using a handheld GPS which is
considered appropriate at this stage of exploration.
• Grid projection system has been standardised in the database to
GDA2020 MGA zone 52
• Surface RL data is collected using GPS, which is then projected to an
SRTM DTM to improve accuracy. This is considered appropriate for
this stage of exploration.
Data spacing
and
distribution
• Data spacing for reporting of Exploration
Results.
• Whether the data spacing and distribution is
sufficient to establish the degree of geological
and grade continuity appropriate for the
Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation
procedure(s) and classifications applied.
• Whether sample compositing has been
applied.
• Figures are provided within the body of the announcement that show
all collar locations and spacing. This data has also been previously
provided in a tabular format.
• Drillhole spacing is considered appropriate for the stage of exploration.
Further drilling is required to establish continuity that may lead to the
estimation of a Mineral Resource.
• Sample compositing has been applied at the sampling stage as
described above.
Orientation of
data in
relation to
geological
structure
• Whether the orientation of sampling achieves
unbiased sampling of possible structures and
the extent to which this is known, considering
the deposit type.
• If the relationship between the drilling
orientation and the orientation of key
mineralised structures is considered to have
introduced a sampling bias, this should be
assessed and reported if material.
• At this early stage of exploration, the exact influence of geological
structure is unknown.
• The relationship between observed mineralisation, host rock, structure
and drill hole orientation is constantly being considered, but is currently
unknown due to the early stage of the maiden drill program at Kuro.
Sample
security
• The measures taken to ensure sample
security.
• Chain of custody is managed by the Company. Samples are freighted
directly to the laboratory with the appropriate documentation.
Audits or
reviews
• The results of any audits or reviews of
sampling techniques and data.
• A review of all available information regarding the sampling techniques,
data and analytical methods has been undertaken by Trek and it is
considered that industry best practice methods have been employed at
all stages of exploration to date.
• Reviews of legacy results have been completed in house by the
previous operator and by Trek prior to, and further upon acquisition of
10
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
the project.
JORC Table Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results:
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral
tenement and
land tenure
status
• Type, reference name/number, location and
ownership including agreements or material
issues with third parties such as joint
ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties,
native title interests, historical sites,
wilderness or national park and environmental
settings.
• The security of the tenure held at the time of
reporting along with any known impediments
to obtaining a license to operate in the area.
• The Project is located ~140 km south-west of Halls Creek in northern Western
Australia and comprises granted licences E80/4975, E80/5082, E80/5083,
E80/5427, E80/5914, E80/6010, and E80/6011, and two applications,
E80/6007 & E80/6012. All tenements are held by Archer X Pty Ltd.
• Key terms for the 100% acquisition of Archer X Pty Ltd by Trek are outlined in
the ASX:TKM release dated 11/10/2023.
• The Licences are located on Native Title determined land belonging to the Yi-
Martuwarra Ngurrara in the West, and the Jaru people in the East. There is
no determined Native Title claim over the Zahn prospect area in the southeast
of the Project.
• Native title, heritage protection and mineral exploration agreements have
been entered into with the Jaru and Yi-Martuwarra Ngurrara Native Title
Holders and Newmont Exploration Pty Ltd and/or Archer X Pty Ltd. All
agreements have been assigned to Archer X Pty Ltd. All fieldwork activities
have been undertaken in conjunction with approval from Native Title
representatives of the Yi-Martuwarra Ngurrara and Jaru people with heritage
surveys completed at Kuro, Martin, Coogan, Willis, Austin and Turner, and
cultural monitors were present when requested. An archaeological survey was
completed prior to drilling activities at Zahn.
• The Project area lies within five cattle stations; Larrawa, Lamboo, Carranya,
Yougawalla and Bulka.
Exploration
done by other
parties
• Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration
by other parties.
• The Project area is relatively under explored with historical activity centred
on the Christmas Creek and Burrtina Pool prospects. A rare earth oxide
Resource within a carbonatite dyke (Cummins Range Project, RareX
Limited, ASX:REE), exists just outside and to the southeast of the Project.
• Gold nuggets were first discovered in proximity to the Christmas Creek in the
1890’s. Barnes (1985) suggests several thousand ounces were produced
from the area, mostly in the 1930s and 1950s. No official production records
exist. Further prospecting and illegal dozing of the site has occurred.
• CRA Exploration Pty Ltd (CRAE) undertook exploration in the area during the
mid-1970s, undertaking an airborne magnetic and radiometric survey, where
percussion drilling returned isolated bismuth (420ppm) and gold (0.6ppm).
• G.B. Barnes and Associates for M.H. Ynema in the mid-1980s to early 1990s
undertook sampling across stockwork veining produced a peak gold value of
21g/t Au. A 20g/t Au result was returned in 1992 after further sampling.
• Billiton Australia explored the southwestern portion of the Project between
1991 and 1994 for Pb-Zn mineralisation. Utilising 2D seismic data collected
in 1985 for oil exploration, gravity, and magnetic data Billiton targeted an oil-
trap style limestone dome with a single 565m deep diamond core hole. No
significant assay results were returned however the model they were
targeting has been superseded.
• Northern Star Resource Ltd completed Air Core (AC) drilling targeting the
CRAE gold‐bismuth anomaly and geophysical aeromagnetic and radiometric
11
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
highs undercover. Forty‐six AC holes were drilled for 1,636m over three
years. No significant assays were returned.
• Newmont entered into a Joint Venture agreement with Archer X Pty Ltd in
2017 and explored the Project until withdrawal in September 2023, with most
of the on groundwork undertaken in the period 2018 – 2022. Exploration
included significant surface geochemistry followed up by limited Air Core and
Reverse Circulation drilling (details outlined in the announcement dated 11th
October 2023, and associated Table 1). Three prospects (Coogan, Martin
and Zahn) have been drill tested and have all returned positive results.
Highlights from Martin include 7m at 4.9g/t Au (including 1m at 29.6g/t Au)
from 24m in hole NEWXCAC196, 2m @ 9.65g/t Au from 72m in
NEWXCRC012 and 3m @ 2.03g/t Au from 137m in NEWXCRC015. At Zahn,
weak polymetallic mineralisation with a maximum intercept of 1m at 1% zinc
was seen in association with sulphides along the contact between
granodiorite and metasedimentary rocks. Drilling at Coogan returned 34m @
0.18g/t Au from 58m in hole NEWXCRC021, 38m @ 0.16g/t Au from 14m
and 30m @ 0.15g/t Au from 144m in hole NEWXCRC029. Newmont also
undertook numerous geophysical surveys, including passive seismic, ground
magnetics, wireline televiewer & airborne EM.
Geology • Deposit type, geological setting and style of
mineralisation.
• The Project is centred on the southernmost extension of the Halls Creek
Orogen, located within the Kimberley region of Western Australia.
Proterozoic sediments of the Project area are broadly correlative with
Proterozoic sediments of northwestern Australia, host to the world class
Callie‐Auron deposit in the Tanami Orogen.
• It is hypothesised that this area may represent a triple junction with the
Granites‐Tanami Orogen, Wunaamin Miliwundi Orogen and the Halls Creek
Orogen. Paleoproterozoic rocks of the eastern zone of the Lamboo Province
are the oldest rocks mapped. Neoproterozoic rocks of the Wolfe and Louisa
Basins are also present. In the Project area, these Palaeo‐ to Neoproterozoic
rocks are largely covered by Phanerozoic rocks of the Canning Basin.
• The exploration undertaken by Newmont has identified gold mineralisation at
Coogan and Martin associated with minor sulphides (pyrite, chalcopyrite) in
quartz veins. Mineralisation at Martin has an association with bismuth,
tellurium, tungsten and sel
Share your feedback
Discover